logoalt Hacker News

randallsquared • yesterday at 6:35 PM • 2 replies • view on HN

Really? A comment in another thread says Pangram says it's 100% AI. I just checked with the free plan, and it told me 29% AI. What I'm learning here is that Pangram may not be a reliable checker.

Thing is, I also twigged it as heavily LLM written when I read it, so. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯


Replies

senderista • yesterday at 6:52 PM

I got the vibe that maybe an LLM was used for editing but the stench wasn't overwhelming.

Wistar • yesterday at 6:51 PM

I checked again with a longer sample—the first eight paragraphs—and, this time, Pangram said 61% human. Hmm. I think your twigging may be more accurate.