logoalt Hacker News

tgsovlerkhgsel • today at 3:16 AM • 1 reply • view on HN

> After much soul-searching, deliberation, and gnashing of teeth, my attorneys and I concluded that the statute of limitations was against us. Because of the thirty-odd years that had passed while I “sat on my rights,” it seemed unlikely we’d make it past a motion to dismiss.

That was my first thought as well.


Replies

edoceo • today at 3:56 AM

Statue of limitations hasn't started because the acts in 1996 by the company and officers are part of an ongoing conspiracy. Maybe?

Source: cannabis and Law&Order reruns.