For context, in response to my original statement:
[LLMs] are statistical token generators whose results are
dependent upon their training data set and involve a degree
of randomness.
This is literally what was written:
During conversation, we are statistical token generators
whose results are dependent upon our training set.
>> If you do not see a difference between humans conversing (known consciousness as defined by humans) and the output of an LLM (known algorithms as defined by humans), I don't know what to say.
> That’s not what they said.
How did I misquote and/or mischaracterize any the above?
alt Hacker News
For context, in response to my original statement:
This is literally what was written: >> If you do not see a difference between humans conversing (known consciousness as defined by humans) and the output of an LLM (known algorithms as defined by humans), I don't know what to say.> That’s not what they said.
How did I misquote and/or mischaracterize any the above?