General intelligence has very different adversarial dynamics compared to nuclear weapons.
Explained further here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49094348
Though there is further nuance in agentic vs non-agentic AI: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49736149
I'm legitimately interested in this argument, but simply stating that good vs evil are in equilibrium is nowhere near enough.
> There will be new adversarial games when everyone's smarter (bio/cyber offense/defense), but those games are always symmetrical in the long run
This is an article of faith, not an argument.