logoalt Hacker News

rstuart4133 • last Wednesday at 11:05 PM • 1 reply • view on HN

> Then why have they been lagging behind OpenAI and Anthropic for most of the last few years,

The reverse could also said to be true. Google has models that run with search, producing usable results in well under a second. I suspect the world is consuming far, far more of those Google tokens then the tokens produced by OpenAI or Anthropic.

So why are OpenAI and Anthropic so far behind? They are serving a different market: the one that wants high intelligence / high cost tokens. Google is targeting the low cost end of the market - ie the commodity. That's where they've always played with search, email, docs and the like. That's were they are playing with AI too, and they are killing it.


Replies

KingMob • yesterday at 6:09 AM

We have very different opinions of the usability of Google's low-end models in search.

If anything, their search was the gold standard, and placing sometimes-wrong LLM results above them has hurt people's perception of both Google's search, and AI in general.

Google made a mistake in prioritizing speed over accuracy there.