> I don't disagree with you that LLM's remove the need for type-safe languages
That feels like a really strong conclusion. I’m not clear on why any safeguard isn’t a useful safeguard if you let agents write all the code.
Yeah, in my personal opinion, seems like Boshalfoshal's conclusion was too strong for me too, but I haven't done development enough with LLM's to make my own determination.
Yeah, in my personal opinion, seems like Boshalfoshal's conclusion was too strong for me too, but I haven't done development enough with LLM's to make my own determination.