logoalt Hacker News

bugake • yesterday at 7:01 AM • 2 replies • view on HN

Primitive iron was inferior to bronze and harder to produce. It was weak, malleable, and rapidly rusted. It only became practical once people learned to make a primitive steel by adding charcoal. This is why it took a long time for iron to replace bronze.


Replies

kees99 • yesterday at 7:14 AM

> Primitive iron was (...) malleable

> primitive steel [made] by adding charcoal.

Isn't that backwards? Surely "primitive iron" was closer to what we call pig iron nowadays.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pig_iron

That stuff is choke-full of carbon and silica, and is brittle as hell. To get it malleable (which is actually desirable in a weapon, so it wouldn't just snap in use), there is a separate process to decrease carbon content:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wrought_iron#Terminology

➕ show 2 replies
netcan • yesterday at 2:28 PM

Primitive steel only becomes common in the middle ages... 2000 years later.

Alexander had an iron sword. Julius had an iron sword.

The problem with iron is that it is very hard to make. Requires lots of fuel, labour and technology.