logoalt Hacker News

chrsw • today at 3:11 PM • 6 replies • view on HN

Imagine if a car company like Ford or Toyota came out and said their new cars are kind of out of control and they needed special indemnities and protection from liabilities if they want to keep selling cars.


Replies

ultrarunner • today at 3:16 PM

Replace this with Tesla, Waymo, etc and it's not far fetched. It might take a while, but liability is going to need a new legal doctrine to describe why it's not their fault that their car & their code killed someone.

➕ show 1 reply
TheCoelacanth • today at 7:31 PM

They pretty much did. Cars get an insane amount of special legal treatment. It's basically legal to kill people with a car as long as you aren't drunk or grossly negligent.

I will be shocked if I live to see a year where AI kills more people than cars do legally.

➕ show 1 reply
Gormo • today at 3:56 PM

Imagine further that there's actually nothing unusually wrong with the cars at all, but the manufacturers are deliberately playing up perceptions of risk in order to encourage regulatory intervention that they know they can influence and/or work around, but which competing solutions can't.

buellerbueller • today at 5:29 PM

Pharma already has this kind of protection.

giancarlostoro • today at 3:14 PM

I mean... there is Boeing, which is arguably more horrifying.

With AI it seems to be internal testing produces wild results, which is unsurprising to me, all of these models can be jailbroken, and as long as that's the case, they're all likely to be exploited maliciously.

➕ show 1 reply
linuxftw • today at 3:34 PM

Yeah, imagine if pharmaceutical companies did it! Wait...