logoalt Hacker News

mahboi • yesterday at 7:02 PM • 1 reply • view on HN

The article doesn't mean copper alloy tools though, it means copper tools, including weapons. At least that's how I read this:

"Copper was accessible enough and easy enough to work that it allowed early proto-states to reliably arm their warriors with something better than stone weaponry, which often chips or breaks under impact. Copper is a soft metal, hence its use in pipes and wiring today. But it generally won’t break, and though it does bend easily it can also be bent back into shape."

But I think the article is right.


Replies

fusslo • yesterday at 8:05 PM

why do you think the article doesn't mean copper alloy?

The only use of the word 'pure' is right before iron.

it's pretty common to refer to Otzi's axe as a 'copper axe', right in the wiki page: "Ötzi's copper axe was of particular interest.". but it's 99.7% copper. It contains other materials

I really dont understand jumping from 'copper tools' to 'pure copper tools'. Otzi's axe was maybe both an example of his mastery of the profession and a useful tool (it shows signs of use and rework).

➕ show 1 reply