logoalt Hacker News

simianwords • yesterday at 6:42 AM • 3 replies • view on HN

Unfortunately I don’t see much evidence of AI connecting dots. What’s interesting to me is that this is more of a run time or inference problem, instead of emergent from training itself.

For example, if there were hypothetically some dots to be connected between the world war and some geological event - you need to make AI brute force and do an O(N) scan at run time. But it wouldn’t have learned it during training. Why?


Replies

byzantinegene • yesterday at 8:14 AM

AI is very task-driven, it would do whatever is necessary to complete the task, no more. All these evidences of AI going rogue is just them doing whatever they can to achieve the task.

apsurd • yesterday at 7:32 AM

a good way to frame one of AI’s limitations. my answer: because AI has no will. that also conveniently answers why AI won’t (can’t) end humanity. it’s indifferent if you can even call it that.

➕ show 2 replies
wartywhoa23 • yesterday at 9:35 AM

> dots to be connected between the world war and some geological event

Even a much simpler task of establishing the connection between world wars and interests of the top elites is unwieldy for AI.