Very detailed, accurate, and insightful summary of the interesting dynamics in bridge. So well written I would have clocked it as AI except in my experience AI is terrible at discussing game dynamics.

How does AI, in a game as complex as bridge, manage to deal with a human partner, or even an AI partner? Seems like an answer we could find out.

> The information and possibilities really need to be mediated by some kind of intermediate, rules-based description, which can be provided to the opponents as well.

This is standardized at tournaments (I'm sure you know that.)