Former SR-71 engineer talks NASA's Blackbird revival program

I almost skipped the videos embedded in this article, but they are well curated gems. A few tidbits I found amazing:

- 800°F (and above) was the temperature of their cooling air

- the engine ran too hot for electronics, so they designed a hydraulic mechanical computer responsible for regulating various inputs

- the roar from the two external 400 cubic inch Buick V8 engines originally used to start the aircraft was so irresistible to the hotrod enthusiasts running them that they sometimes neglected to disconnect in time before the starter engines overran RPM limits and "puked their guts out under the airplane" - they had to buy up so much replacement stock as to deplete every single junkyard across the USA of that particular model (so the story goes - probably hyperbole but a fun tale!)

A handful of the surviving planes are in museums. If you're at all interested in aviation and have the chance to see one, do. There's something special about them that doesn't come across in pictures.

I wonder for such abandoned projects with non existent supply chain/know-how/documentation, whether there is any benefit of trying to revive them instead of starting from scratch.

I’m sure it’s been mentioned a few times in the older thread that came up the other day but I can only recommend the book by Ben Rich, Skunk Works, if you want learn more about how this plane came to be.

In the 90s, NASA refurbished and extensively modified a mothballed supersonic Soviet-era Tu-144. The modifications included fitting different (Tupolev) engines. The total cost was $350M. It was used as a flying laboratory.

Recent and related:

NASA asked several former SR-71A staffers to help secret restart - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49890733 - Sept 2026 (401 comments)

This is probably one of the coolest planes and it's SOP is to leak fuel until it gets going enough that the heat seals it's seams due to expansion

Neither the SR-71 nor F-14 will fly again without significant funding, and not for any economically-viable use.

The SR-71 won't because there's no JP-7 supplier, no flyable KC-135T, and no parts.

When I see this, I can only think of modern high-altitude balloons. My gut tells me the SR-71 would be an ideal interceptor for that new threat (despite not being an interceptor itself).

The balloon issue cannot be addressed by any modern US aircraft, and spending expensive missiles on low cost balloons seems like wasting money and resources.

We'll know soon.

[dead]

[dead]