In the USA you can get around such administrative batshittery[0] in lower side courts like this one by targeting the competence / career of the judge itself essentially by putting them in catch 22s where the right thing is to do the thing you want. That is usually having cases where an appeal court will cancel their ruling and in that ruling question the competence of the judge to continue being a judge or legal professional, which the battshittery exposes them to that specific risk. This is something you can do more in common law systems vs. the napoleonic courts that France has AFAIK, and the US constitution also helps here too.

This is usually how you get hostile government organizations & staff to do what you want, you need to hit them in the career and figure out how to do so quickly.

[0] batshittery = where they are doing things like ignoring basic logic / reality and other obviously against the law things

This is also, as you know, why france loves it's strikes & protests because the citizenry feel like they have nothing else.