logoalt Hacker News

nickdothutton • today at 8:24 AM • 5 replies • view on HN

Ah yes, Huawei, that well known adherent to patent agreements.


Replies

phatfish • today at 8:30 AM

Patents just embed western monopolies and cost everyone except the sovereign wealth funds and private equity that own everything in the west.

Someone has to tear it down, and it's not going to come from within. No balls on this side.

➕ show 1 reply
vincnetas • today at 8:27 AM

You know, at this scale law, is more like suggestion if benefits of not following it are better.

Apple ordered to pay $5.7bn after losing vibration tech patent suit (https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c6je85n2vyleo)

You can ask AI to summarise the list of when for example apple ignored patents. I get 16 cases.

AlanYx • today at 1:49 PM

Chinese phone manufacturers that use Qualcomm hardware generally do respect the royalty system. Though they pay a lower total royalty because of a 2015 antitrust action in China, which forced Qualcomm to calculate royalties on 65% of the net selling price of devices sold for use in China, rather than 100% used in most of the rest of the world. (For those unfamiliar, Qualcomm's royalties are not a flat fee per device/modem, they're calculated as a percentage of the total selling price of the finished device, sometimes with a negotiated cap.)

China is playing the long game here because they expect domestically generated IP revenue to be significant in the future.

dudisubekti • today at 8:49 AM

What a strange sarcasm, nobody's forcing Qualcomm to do this.

whatever1 • today at 8:27 AM

QC will send them a sad emoji if their patents are violated in China.

➕ show 1 reply