I think I already answered this in my comment. I claimed that I don't see much value in a magical black box theorem-proving oracle whose proofs could not, and would not, be understood by humans.
If you disagree (as the GP does, apparently), I ask you--what value do you see in it?
You claimed it would be worthless but did not give any supporting rationale for that claim. That is the ideological move. Professionals are often blind to this.