> Pay your taxes. If you don't like your taxes, vote to have them changed, but don't complain that you can't cheat your way out of the taxes that everyone else is paying

Let's say there are two classes of software engineers: A and B.

- A get paid $50k/year

- B get paid double that.

The reason why A gets paid lower is because they are commodity software engineers. Due to supply and demand, there is an oversupply of these commodity engineers which make them so cheap. They are very hardworking but so are B.

B are very high quality, creative, high impact engineers. These are highly capable people and due to biology and how IQ is distributed, naturally their numbers are way limited than the class A. Due to their productivity, impact and supply, their market price is higher.

Given the same inputs, B produces way more useful and valuable (to society) outputs than A. Their incomes reflect this.

From a voting perspective, members of both A and B both have the same number of votes.

Now questions:

1. What are your thoughts if A passes laws and regulations where their class doesn't pay any taxes but B's pays 60%?

2. given that software engineering is an extremely creative process, problem solving ability typically scales with IQ, and IQ follows a bell distribution, the literal volume of A is much higher than B, aka laws that put B at a disadvantage get passed incredibly faster than the other way around (due to sheer volume in a democratic process).

Do these resonate with you? Are there any logical fallacies in these statements?

If so, what are your thoughts about them? What should class B do?