logoalt Hacker News

peri-cl • yesterday at 1:24 PM • 2 replies • view on HN

Surely it's a galactic algorithm that you can't physically run? You wouldn't get a constant as small as 2^{-182} without some other numbers elsewhere being incredibly large.

From the "Introduction" section of that paper: "The constants and thresholds in the construction are extremely large".

(And verifying if the algorithm multiplies correctly or not is the less-interesting part of this, anyway. Gets you no closer to verifying the complexity result).


Replies

hyperbovine • yesterday at 1:40 PM

Isn't it possible that all of the integers that have been or will ever be encountered, anywhere, any time, in human history, number less than 2^182? In which case you could argue that integer multiplication is O(1) via LUT :)

➕ show 1 reply
auspiv • yesterday at 1:44 PM

someone else picked up that bit of math and has run with it and has refined it downwards multiple times. believe it is now in the range of 2^-18 or so

➕ show 1 reply