logoalt Hacker News

alwa • yesterday at 4:10 PM • 2 replies • view on HN

This seems like a good time to educate myself about the application (and objection) process.

The bureaucracy seems precision-engineered to stultify, but apparently the public have 104 days after “String Confirmation Day” (17th Nov; capitalization theirs) to lodge objections, assuming the “GAC” doesn’t beat them to it…

https://newgtldprogram.icann.org/en/application-rounds/round...

…of course there’s a “filing fee,” priced in “hours of a panel of lawyers’ time,” to lodge such an objection…

https://newgtldprogram-2026-agb.icann.org/en/8-module-4-comm...

…welp, hope somebody more organized (and better-funded) than I can organize an objection. Much as I feel like I’m giving up my right to gripe by assuming somebody else will come along to do the weeding.


Replies

ZeroWidthJoiner • yesterday at 5:20 PM

Following "String Confirmation Day" there's also a "Name Collision Risk Management Framework" assessment that new gTLDs will need to pass in order for the application to proceed: https://icannwiki.org/Name_Collision_Risk_Management_Framewo...

This may very well end up to be determined too risky to be delegated, like .corp, .home and .mail in 2018.

gavinsyancey • yesterday at 9:23 PM

There's a short list of grounds they will consider for an objection, and none of them are applicable here. Paraphrasing your second link, they only allow:

- "String Confusion" -- looks or sounds like an existing (approved or being applied for) gTLD. Must be filed by whoever owns (or is applying for) that gTLD.

- "Legal Rights" -- someone else owns a trademark this would violate. Must be filed by whoever's legal rights would be violated.

- "Limited Public Interest" -- the gTLD is immoral under recognized principles of international law. I have no idea when this could be applicable.

- "Community" -- An established community organization believes the group this gTLD is intended to target will object to it. This seems more like a vehicle for e.g. Little People of America to let ICANN know that ".midget" would be offensive.

Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be a way to tell ICANN that .lan has been widely used and will break things in a way they will listen to.

➕ show 1 reply