>these companies need to adhere to the scientific community rather than expecting the opposite

Why? The pre-existing community doesn't own science.

Considering how hostile the community sometimes is to outsiders, how they frequently demand form over function and think connections are often more important than correctness of argument, perhaps it's good for them to be confronted with a new approach to science that does away with those things and returns to the real cornerstones: proof and empiricism.

If you don't want to engage with proofs that's your call, many of us are happy to see progress being made and don't need you specifically for the confirmation