They aren't even severing the relationship with the provider, let alone censoring the person.
It's "free speech", not "full agreement".
> They aren't even severing the relationship with the provider, let alone censoring the person.
Which is what makes it the hollow virtue signaling I said it was. I never claimed they were being censored.
> They aren't even severing the relationship with the provider, let alone censoring the person.
Which is what makes it the hollow virtue signaling I said it was. I never claimed they were being censored.