logoalt Hacker News

bryanrasmussen • yesterday at 8:31 PM • 1 reply • view on HN

It's pretty obvious why peace is a necessary ingredient, firstly the breadth of invention in peace time is wider.

In peace time people invent things for peace and for war, in war time the focus is all on inventing things for war. Screw everything else.

Later on, after the war is over, it may turn out many of the things that were invented for war may also have uses for peace, this however is perhaps not always the case. I don't think the inventions of the first world war that spring first to my mind had a lot of utility beyond war.

The second obvious reason why peace would be a necessary ingredient is the cause of all that inventiveness around creating things for war, it's because in war you are in danger all the time of being killed, which is why when you are not hiding somewhere trying not to be killed you are trying to make things to kill the other guy because if you kill the other guy they can't kill you. If you get killed however, that will be a big dampener on your ingenuity.

Some people might think differently about this state of war, because of historical blindness and the inefficiencies of the English language. If a country is big and powerful enough it can go to war elsewhere, and never have the war touch it.

This is not really war as it has been known in most of the history of humanity, but we call it war. It is really a time of peace in the homeland, and distributed external war.

And in this time of peace in the homeland, people can work peacefully without fear of being killed, and then people who think that this is war say - hey, check it out, peace is not needed for invention and progress at all!


Replies

broken-kebab • yesterday at 11:48 PM

It sounds like an interesting thought, but can you ground it to the facts? It's not as obvious as you claim. Like there are plenty of things and ideas we use now which were found cause somebody worked on originally military goals. I don't have numbers though to compare it to "peaceful inventions", and it gets even murkier deeper in history.

I have deep suspicion however that abundance may work against inventiveness cause humans are optimized for laziness (or call it safety and energy saving to make more neutral), and whole societies seem to be generally optimized for stability, while inventions are inherently disruptive, and require work besides just thinking.