You know what would be a great reaction from the so called "community" ?

Hey! It is really nice that you have dropped solution for so many open problems. We appreciate it and would like to see more. However, can you please work on the output writing/explanation quality? It is hard to read and understand. We would be happy to independently validate these but current paper quality leaves much to be desired.

That's it. This would make paper quality an important target for next generation models.

If problem was unreadable proofs, that would have been the reaction. But that's not what we are seeing :)

FWIW, in many online platforms, many actual mathematicians who referee papers, have said the quality of the papers are not outstanding, but they are still better than average.