logoalt Hacker News

dannyw • last Monday at 11:38 AM • 2 replies • view on HN

Why do you think it's too costly? It's well known that there are divisions in DPRK that are focused on generating $ through crypto hacks and compromises.

We're dealing with reasonably sophisticated state actors here in this dark forest; not script kiddies.

Cheap $5 PCB + programmable small FPGA is a very viable route too for hardware implants; but even a microcontroller / ESP32/etc will probably do.


Replies

thinkmassive • last Monday at 1:27 PM

> A technical account published by Tibane Labs described an arrangement involving a microcontroller, cellular communication hardware and connections to the screen’s internal data lines.

Cellular communications hardware seems very sophisticated and expensive compared to a simple microcontroller.

➕ show 1 reply
Neywiny • last Monday at 7:25 PM

Other commentator covered it a bit but BOM cost is a negligible percentage