logoalt Hacker News

wood_spirit • today at 4:27 PM • 6 replies • view on HN

Seems generally like a good thing? I know the biggest difference I can think of in my lifetime is just how much better insulated houses are. Not on a par with Scandinavia, but still massively improved from even the peak electricity consumption period in the charts of 2005. I wonder how much that contributes to the overall reduction in demand.


Replies

praxulus • today at 4:58 PM

It can be good or bad depending on what's driving the change. Improving efficiency, assuming it comes at a reasonable cost, is generally good.

If people are just going without, then that's generally bad.

➕ show 1 reply
advisedwang • today at 4:33 PM

Only 9% of the UK is electric only heating [1], so I suspect heating is not a large driver here.

[1] https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/housing/...

mhh__ • today at 4:54 PM

No it's a catastrophic failure of planning and institutional nerve.

➕ show 2 replies
badatnames • today at 4:40 PM

Just an observation, but my first thought was how energy demand strongly correlates with economic growth and wondered if the article could be cast in that light. Might be fun to overlay that graph with UK gilt rates

edit: helpful robot boyfriend plotted it https://i.imgur.com/Hp199vV.png

➕ show 1 reply
pj_mukh • today at 4:41 PM

Isn’t most of the housing in the UK from the 1970’s too?

➕ show 4 replies
NooneAtAll3 • today at 6:31 PM

jevon's paradox says that improved efficiencies would increase consumption

I see a lot of comments here see "per capita" and think "residential consumption" - but the decrease is more indicating of general deindustrialization

➕ show 1 reply