logoalt Hacker News

stymaar • yesterday at 4:37 PM • 4 replies • view on HN

We don't lack the industrial capacity either, we mostly lack a good reason to spend these resources in that direction.

And IMHO that's the main explanation for the Fermi paradox: we don't see aliens everywhere because they don't have a good reason to colonize other planets than their own either.


Replies

7373737373 • yesterday at 4:56 PM

Would that not also imply that improvements in ease of access to space, increase of energy production and -price reduction all level off before it becomes easy and affordable enough that mere curiosity would suffice to make it possible, for ALL civilizations?

➕ show 1 reply
mytailorisrich • yesterday at 5:03 PM

We do lack the technological capacity.

Travelling to another star would require a fully self-contained spaceship with energy, life support, food, medical facilities, even production facilities able to function for centuries or millenia. We simply don't know how to do that.

➕ show 1 reply
kakacik • yesterday at 8:04 PM

Pure race long term survival, any sane civilization knows very well a single space item hurling fast enough can wipe out all conplex life on planet. Or vulcanoes, tectonics etc. Also every star eventually goes down, usually pretty violently (but thats properly a long term concern).

Its not 'if' question, just 'when'. You cant be space faring civilization and not know this.

➕ show 1 reply
iso1631 • yesterday at 6:33 PM

Once it becomes cheap enough then religious or similar cults will do it, and the cost of doing isn't a great deal more than colonising the solar system where are are economic benefits.

That assumes reaching 5 light years in say 50 years

However once it's done a few times, then it can't be stopped. If you're going at say 1/1000th of the speed of light (50 years to travel, 450 years to settle and build the next wave is 1% the speed of light) then your successor species will have colonised the galaxy in 100 million years, and we know that hasn't happened.