logoalt Hacker News

pfdietz • yesterday at 9:15 PM • 2 replies • view on HN

I believe what you are talking about there is forensic genealogy. That doesn't track down people who are in the database, but finds people who are distantly related and then, through genealogical information, figures out who the suspect could be.

In other words, the people who put their DNA up help track down dangerous criminals. This doesn't sound like something people would object to. I certainly wouldn't.

And this is not the discrimination we were talking about, unless we have now defined the tracking down of murderers and rapists as "discrimination".


Replies

vikramkr • today at 3:06 AM

No, you don't put your DNA up with the intent of it tracking criminals, your DNA is in the system and it can be used by law enforcement, could be at a price, would hopefully be with a warrant, but or could be and has historically been done without user consent or a warrant (like was going on with GEDmatch).

And no it's not - I'm not sure why you narrowed it down so far to use cases with consent and a warrant. That's obviously not what I'm referring to at all. The initial point was about sold off to discriminate "God knows where," public private etc.

it's already legal to discriminate in life insurance based on genetic data. Here's quest diagnostics bragging about how good that division is doing at providing lab data, both real and current: https://blog.examone.com/blog/2022/12/20/50-years-of-laborat...

Genetics targeted marketing is a thing: https://www.ama.org/2020/12/16/genetic-data-and-marketing-ch...

It's a rather bold move to look at the American healthcare system, the state of privacy regulations, and the general practices of like everyone involved and decide that you don't have to worry about your DNA ending up being used for some bullshit you didn't consent to if you let some random third party put it in their database.

Dylan16807 • today at 1:06 AM

> dangerous criminals

It's not like they're putting the evidence through a proper trial before using it to find people. A lot of them are innocent. And I'm pretty sure guilt doesn't imply dangerous either. And if they're a not-distant relative, for most crimes I probably don't want to be a big factor in them getting locked up.