> There should be a rule that any assertion of conspiracy must at least have some evidence.

Broadly, I agree, and good grief do I wish people would follow this more often. But Google specifically has acted incredibly anti-competitively for several years now [0], especially regarding Android. This has gone on for such a long time that they have, in my mind, lost the benefit of any doubt.

As they continue to lock down Android [1], things that would have once been met with a "Wait and see" approach are instead met with suspicion and a default assumption that it's primarily (though not typically exclusively) done to serve their own interests.

So generally, yes! That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. However, Google's history is all the evidence I need to assume their actions are not done in good faith.

[0] https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/07/googles-iron-grip-on...

[1] https://manualdousuario.net/en/blocking-unverified-apps-andr...