alt Hacker NewsAI can do no wrong if you can always attribute any mistakes or problems to human error. The problem is if humans are making so many errors, at what point do you blame the tool and say it’s not fit for broad use?
AI can do no wrong if you can always attribute any mistakes or problems to human error. The problem is if humans are making so many errors, at what point do you blame the tool and say it’s not fit for broad use?
Your reasoning would apply just as well to computers. We have all kinds of things where the expectation is, or was, that you don't ask the computer to do things you don't want, and the times when that expectation has been eroded in favor of "the computer isn't fit for the general public" have been a mistake.