Or you can read what they said and see that it's neither. Not sure why credentials would have any bearing on the material of their comment.

They're pointing out the article lacks substance implied by its title, and essentially that it would be nice to see the actual bad actors being prosecuted instead of the middleman. Both positive things to hear for me? Who cares if they work for the industry.

(The former thing is positive because it saves me time reading the article for information that won't be there.)