logoalt Hacker News

Credit where credit is due

42 points • by evakhoury • last Friday at 5:53 PM • 25 comments • view on HN

Comments

hatthew • today at 8:27 PM

This article is chock full of interesting links. The link about Kenyan English/LLMs [0] describes something that feels like it should have been obvious to me.

[0]: https://marcusolang.substack.com/p/im-kenyan-i-dont-write-li...

➕ show 1 reply
pxc • today at 9:20 PM

> In a post on his blog, software engineer Indradhanush Gupta writes that he is no lon­ger crediting Anthropic’s Claude on his code changes, because "adding an LLM as co-author gives you a way for you to shirk responsibility for mistakes." Pressed by commenters that this sounds like a pretext for hiding LLM use, Gupta insists that it is not.

I use LLMs every day at work. At the same time, I've never had an LLM appear as a "co-author", not because I'm making any effort to hide my LLM use, but because I've never been comfortable letting an LLM commit code. I use staging changes, hunk by hunk (or sometimes even line-by-line), as my review process. I don't want LLMs performing any git operations that add or push commits. I imagine I'm not the only one.

PS: If you want some bumpers to help avoid having your LLMs commit code, configuring Git for commit signing and blocking access to your signing key, agent socket, write access to your local Git config, etc., is pretty effective in my experience.

➕ show 1 reply
98codes • today at 9:41 PM

You're telling me this author uses that many em-dashes in their normal writing?

➕ show 1 reply
1asgtq • today at 8:04 PM

Academics have completely lost it. The number of mathematicians who write with LLMs and are rationalizing their usage is frightening.

And they have the audacity to claim that the public will defund them if they don't use new tech. No, the public will defund you if you continue cheating like a 10 year old and you are evidently superfluous.

Just say no!

➕ show 2 replies
matt3210 • today at 7:30 PM

Tools can’t have credit, only People.

➕ show 1 reply
bassie123 • today at 9:02 PM

I wonder what it was like when we first got calculators; people saying its cheating at arithmetic. AI is just the next tool humans can apply to problems to solve.

➕ show 1 reply
warkdarrior • today at 7:51 PM

> Then we can all asses how useful they really are.

Clearly not written by LLM. (NB: emphasis mine)

ChrisMarshallNY • today at 7:11 PM

I've been increasingly letting the LLM take the wheel, in my coding. It's working out very, very well.

I undersign everything under my imprimatur; LLM, contract programmer, intern, whatever. If it has my chop; it has my support and accountability.

The "A" word (Accountability) has been getting deprecated far longer than LLMs have been around. It seems that no one wants to stand behind their work, anymore; regardless of how that work was done.

I had the advantage of spending almost 27 years, at a company that really made sure that I was Accountable. I ran a team, but it was my butt on the line.

➕ show 1 reply