logoalt Hacker News

benrutter • yesterday at 1:22 PM • 3 replies • view on HN

Haha, there's something so true and so boring about the fact that we'd all be much happier with a good public transport system than flying cars.


Replies

BoxwoodSeed • yesterday at 7:44 PM

Public transport has inherent problems that cannot be solved that will always have it be less convenient than a car.

(1) Does not pick you up from your home and does not drop you off at where you need to go.

(2) Does not start at your schedule. Missed by a hair? Wait up to 2h.

(3) Impossible to transport more than you can carry.

(4) Does not scale. When there are too many people, some will have to wait for the next train or bus. When there are too few people everything still moves around nearly empty.

(5) Being exposed to the public, which could mean drug addicts and insane people that will stab you in the neck for no reason. But mostly just smelly lowlifes that might take a piss in front of you.

No matter how great your public transport is, it cannot solve these inherent issues while being cheaper than a car.

➕ show 2 replies
phoghed • yesterday at 2:22 PM

> we

The problem is that the same "we" won't let you build it.

xhkkffbf • yesterday at 3:13 PM

While I respect the public transit system, it has many disadvantages over private cars. The NYC subway, for instance, is amazing in many ways, but if you're just slightly old or infirm, you can't navigate it. DC's subway, built at a yuge price, does have elevators but they are often broken. And if you're traveling at non-rush hours, you'll have to wait 5-20 minutes and then pause your trip for every stop along the way.

I can see how a young, fit and childless 20 something would be much happier with a good public transport system, but once you stop fitting that narrow model, your affection for urban dreams dies slowly.

And don't get me started on the price for construction and maintenance.

➕ show 3 replies