> Ok then whatever claims you’ve made against Elon I can deny since it’s just Copperfield unless I’ve seen it myself lol.

You misunderstand - I’m claiming the opposite - your eyes are not sufficient proof. Just because you saw a flying car does not mean there was a flying car. See also: David Copperfield.

And I can cite references for all my claims about Elon. Do you need to see them?

> No. Get a grip.

Your sentence doesn’t parse, full stop. If it does, please show how. Every time you dodge the question of the main verb, you provide more evidence against yourself.