logoalt Hacker News

gopher_space • yesterday at 8:21 PM • 2 replies • view on HN

Actually came here to "attack" that point. It's a view of reality that requires a conceptual bias-free media as reference for any commentary, and bias-free media is a tautology.

Compelling a perspective is the only thing cinematography / photography is doing. Bias equals point of view. There can't be any unbiased point of view because they're the same thing.

There's a conversation on education to be had here.


Replies

tonymet • yesterday at 8:58 PM

You're right but the distributors and creators pretend that documentaries are objective fact-finding media. and so does the audience.

Look at Super Size Me . The trailers, news media, promotions, critics, broader news media presented it as an objective case study. And McDonalds canceled a popular sales promotion over it. *and it had an enormous negative influence on McDonald's reputation, that it still hasn't yet recovered from.

90+% of people watch and share documentaries with the perspective that they are objective, truth seeking works.

➕ show 1 reply
tonymet • yesterday at 9:03 PM

If A24 / Nathan Fielder promoted this "documentary" like Ali-G / Sasha Baron Kohen's works, they would be honest about it.

Kohen lampoons subjects in candid videos but at least presents his works as a joke, and we're all in on it.

This movie is the exact same thing, but it's promoted as an inside & sincere look at Holmes, when it's really just the Ali G schtick.