Ok, I hadn't understood what you meant.

> In my personal experience, it is not worth to make it write code

Sure, totally fine with that! I am completely okay with people not using LLMs, just like I am completely okay with people using an IDE instead of vim. Do what works for you.

> I would guess that it isn't necessarily efficient for [Linus Torvalds] to generate code with an LLM

It seems like he disagrees: sometimes it makes him more efficient. But in any case, I think it is his choice. I won't judge him for using an LLM, or an IDE, or even if he wanted to develop on Windows. Why should I care? I care about his contributions.

My problem is that many people say "I don't like working with LLMs, so I don't want other to use them". If you don't like working with LLMs, just don't. And let others use the tools they want.

Except if it is philosophical: something like "I believe LLMs are bad for society because X and Y, and I don't want to be related to them". Similar to "I don't want to work with weapons" or "I refuse to open source my code because it could be used to build weapons". Sure, I respect such ideas. I don't respect the "I don't like this tool so I think people who use that tool are unprofessional".