alt Hacker NewsThis is why I absolutely will die on the hill that models can't be called open source if we don't have the source that created them.
This is why I absolutely will die on the hill that models can't be called open source if we don't have the source that created them.
I understand this in principle, but I've been wondering: what guarantee do you have that the sources that are claimed to be the training are the resulting model weights, without interference?
Maybe you trust the creator more, when they release the training materials as open source, but I don't see how you'd get a guarantee.