logoalt Hacker News

solidsnack9000 • yesterday at 7:28 PM • 8 replies • view on HN

Maybe we would be better off in the US if zoning, permitting, &c was hoisted up to the state level.


Replies

scottious • yesterday at 7:47 PM

YES. I think homeowners are too close to the problem to make rational choices.

People move to a place and then expect it to never change again. After all, they bought a house there because they liked it as it is now.

All that does is create places that are encased in amber and unable to adapt. Homeowners have a disproportionate say. aspiring homeowners don't show up to local city council meetings

The top-down approach surely has problems too, I'm not denying that. I just think we need people in charge who can look at the problem holistically and say "hey maybe that inner suburb next to transit shouldn't force you to have a 1/2 acre lot".

This is a complicated issue. What if those people in charge decide your town would be better as a highway? I don't know... it's complicated.

➕ show 4 replies
SOLAR_FIELDS • yesterday at 8:26 PM

Isn't that fundamentally what California did to solve the problem? They provided a route that a local municipality could not override to build housing, as long as the state level rules were followed.

mixdup • yesterday at 7:42 PM

Fun fact, that's basically the case in large swaths of the country. Many states do not have home rule, which means counties can't set zoning rules. So in mostly rural areas of these states, it's wide open unless the state has decided to set rules or to be benevolent enough to grant the county the right to set zoning rules

CobrastanJorji • yesterday at 8:38 PM

I dunno, it seems like decisions about what to build in a given spot should be made as locally as possible. If I want to build a house in Sonoma, the voters in LA should not get a say.

Major projects like power plants or dams should be made at a state or even national level, but rules for which house goes where, less so. And if your town's rules are overly burdensome and stupid, that's an issue for your town's government to solve.

cortesoft • yesterday at 7:50 PM

Many states operate that way, and many other states have rules that limit what the local governments can do.

guelo • yesterday at 8:12 PM

That has been the recent trend in California with several laws restricting local development power.

intrasight • yesterday at 8:03 PM

No, that would be terrible and much worse, obviously, compared to walking down the street to my local borough building and getting a permit. In the vast majority of the country, that would be very silly suggestion.

bethekidyouwant • yesterday at 8:40 PM

This is all backlash from the eminent domain seizures of the 70s when they built those stupid highways through the middle of everyone city