alt Hacker NewsThe commit $1 billion in tokens to "defenders". $1 billion directly to QA for open source projects [1] which would write 100% code coverage, run ASAN and fuzzers would be more effective.
But of course there would be no marketing.
[1] From whom you stole everything in the first place.
Replies
orangedog • today at 2:36 PM
To be pedantic, would that not be marketing?
To be further pedantic, is that really stealing? They are disregarding copyright but was anything taken from anybody? I thought that was the old argument for piracy, ie, nobody was deprived of anything.
➕ show 1 reply
I'm as frustrated as the next open source maintainer, but "stole" goes too far. We gave that code away with pride, knowing the world would be a better place.