logoalt Hacker News

hulitu • today at 7:54 PM • 6 replies • view on HN

> thought extinct for 6000 years

Does this makes sense for an English speaker ?


Replies

bryanrasmussen • today at 8:19 PM

In British English it is totally reasonable and in fact relatively elegant, in American it might take a couple of seconds to figure out what was being said and it would seem ungainly for this reason.

On the British elegance: in British English one could of course use "thought to be extinct" and in these kinds of structures it has become common as a stylistic touch to drop the helping infinitive, "to be", considering it implied.

ChrisMarshallNY • today at 8:05 PM

I don't usually use this structure, but my mother did, and she was an awesome writer. She was British, so it may be more common, over there.

culi • today at 8:03 PM

Yes but they could've used the word "considered" instead.

"Possum considered extinct for 6,000 years"

samatman • today at 8:00 PM

It's a bad sentence. They mean "thought to have gone extinct 6000 years ago". But some allowance for headline constraints should be given.

mistrial9 • today at 9:19 PM

yes I recognize that as legitimate grammar, in a literary way.. It can be spoken that way, too..

akk0 • today at 8:06 PM

Yes, with the caveat that it's the distinct dialect of Headlinese