Humans can be wrong, but luckily we have an entire process for dealing with this, which is broadly called this new fangled 'science' thing
> but luckily we have an entire process for dealing with this
and why does this "peer-review" new-age thing cannot be used to scrutinize AI-writted/AI-assisted papers?
> but luckily we have an entire process for dealing with this
and why does this "peer-review" new-age thing cannot be used to scrutinize AI-writted/AI-assisted papers?