alt Hacker NewsAI models do not have ANY "take" on humans.
You ask an LLM a question, then it is humanity answering back, not the AI.
These "controversial" takes on humans are not controversial - they are midwit statistically mainstream opinions expressed in the training data.
Replies
iJohnDoe • yesterday at 6:23 PM
I would say this probably spot on correct.
What would be more fascinating is for it to explain how it came to these conclusions.
Because I find it interesting it’s a modern time conclusion. Some of it mentioned god and the planet, but all the smartphone and group think aspects seem very recent. Basically, all politics and social media based.
➕ show 1 reply
To an extent yes. But there is no previous version of humanity that incorporates every perspective of every viewpoint ever expressed in writing before. It's obviously derivative of its training material but that doesn't stop it having a novel aspect.