When you make the training sets large enough, likely all a superset of the common crawl dataset, there is going to be a massive amount in common, and a massive amount of duplication of common subject matter and shared opinions.

What's mildly interesting to me is not the similar answers but the similar interpretation of the question as more about non-controversial human foibles and inconsistencies of belief and action. But I guess that's on us, as authors of the training material, reflecting common views on what is or is not controversial.