logoalt Hacker News

stackghost • yesterday at 10:55 PM • 4 replies • view on HN

LLMs are not conscious and cannot have "takes". They stochastically produce a simulacrum of a human's takes based on their training, which is not the same thing.


Replies

fennecbutt • yesterday at 11:03 PM

But then if you observe human behaviour at a macro level don't we do the same?

I think we like to pretend that we don't. But even if you think about it from a bio/physics point of view, all we are is just a bunch of biological wires and neurotransmitter packages.

I know there's the whole unproven quantum tubule nonsense but even that would be a physics effect that we could learn about, manipulate and extort just as we have with everything else we've learnt about our realities.

gste • yesterday at 11:15 PM

That suggests they can't make inferences or produce any original insights, which is wrong. They can absolutely have takes.

Even if it's a simulacrum, it's a simulacrum based on nearly everything that was ever written. No one who has ever lived can claim to know what these models have trained on.

➕ show 3 replies
DriverDaily • today at 1:04 AM

Aren’t human takes also a simulacrum of other human takes based on training?

consensus1 • today at 1:10 AM

How do you know they are not conscious?

➕ show 1 reply