logoalt Hacker News

tourmalinetaco • yesterday at 11:18 PM • 1 reply • view on HN

Then what is the point? You didn’t actually describe where your definition differs and why. What makes it “dangerous” to think that way?


Replies

PaulDavisThe1st • yesterday at 11:29 PM

It is dangerous because it completely fails to grasp or convey what these systems might be capable of.

The point is that when you build a system with the level of internal complexity that LLMs have, they tend to have emergent properties that are not well-described by a naive and/or low level description of their operation. You will not understand what contemporary "ordinary" computers do or are used for if you think of them as only a series of silicon semiconductor transistors, even thought that is undoubtedly what they are.

We don't yet really know what the right level is to understand the behavior we see from LLMs, but I'd wager "just a probabilistic database" is not it.

➕ show 1 reply