logoalt Hacker News

alpineman • today at 7:36 AM • 14 replies • view on HN

And eating a single burger results in the equivalent Co2 emissions of 17,000 requests in Sweden and 2,000 requests in Texas.

Reducing/stopping meat consumption and replacing it with healthy plant-based tofu, seitan, tempeh etc has a far bigger impact (and as a bonus, living beings don't have to suffer)


Replies

shoobiedoo • today at 8:37 AM

Tell you what, I'll keep eating beef, walking to work, and not using AI. Closer to how our ancestors lived for hundreds of thousands of years, so it can't be too off the mark.

➕ show 1 reply
CalRobert • today at 7:51 AM

True, but with autonomous agents hitting 2,000 requests is a lot easier.

EdwardDiego • today at 8:34 AM

Where did you get those stats from? Curious.

➕ show 1 reply
uludag • today at 8:14 AM

That's actually kind of a scary statistic... I probably eat a burgur at most every month (beef maybe once a week at most) but probably make more than 2000 requests a day.

Your comment makes me really contextualize my AI usage and want to reduce it for ecological reasons.

achille • today at 8:14 AM

why not both? some perspective:

  0.5 Pwh/yr - worldwide data center energy
  4-5 PWh/yr - meat total farm to table
  166 PWh/yr - worldwide total energy production
the true bottleneck and cost we have is energy, carbon is a polite proxy if you can meaningfully cut down the energetic cost, that's very valuable either way

maybe tomorrow you'll want to spin up a GPU on the cloud to briefly run a model, pick a data center:

  DC #1: EU Efficient, but has ~100ms additional latency
  DC #2: TX Runs on jet engine turbines, neighbors complain of noise and air pollution
env impact is something worth considering regardless of industry
pseudony • today at 7:48 AM

I think that is a bit out of the blue. But it is fun to imagine a billboard-sized app for a referendum on burgers or AI.

That will put some sweat on some brows :)

vlyan • today at 8:00 AM

I want you to imagine someone like Jenovah's Witnesses trying to moralize people on the Internet. how successful do you estimate such effort might be?

➕ show 2 replies
lawn • today at 8:10 AM

Your comparison only makes sense if you also consider how many requests are being made.

The "only the biggest thing matters" is a faulty logic. If you truly care about the environment then we need to improve things across the board.

And moralizing about living beings doesn't help your cause here.

➕ show 1 reply
soco • today at 8:10 AM

It's not an or/or is it.

schleck8 • today at 7:39 AM

I've seen people who hate AI instantly become defensive as soon as someone brings up the water usage for a kg of beef. It's selective outrage.

I don't like whataboutism, but this isn't whataboutism because the meat industry requires way more water per capita like you pointed out. You have to create products twice, once for feed and once to raise the cows.

➕ show 2 replies
thesdev • today at 7:45 AM

Source?

➕ show 1 reply
wartywhoa23 • today at 7:43 AM

Could as well stop breathing to make way for the Super Intellect, that's what every sane transhumanist must do!

Gigachad • today at 7:39 AM

Giving up AI would be much easier and less disruptive.

➕ show 2 replies