“But they [Machines] won’t be good at finding questions.”
Yeah, I’m calling BS on this claim. They already are capable at finding new questions and/or pointing you in a new or novel direction.
"Pointing you" is very different from "finding questions on their own", or useful math. Pointing you presupposes a human is there to value their question.
Which is precisely my point. That's why humans will always be needed
Useful new questions and useful new or novel directions? What's the signal-to-noise ration there?
I think AI is going to improve a lot of things but people thinking the future is on auto-pilot now are delusional.