logoalt Hacker News

riknos314 • today at 12:59 AM • 5 replies • view on HN

Deepseek prices their models based on a 10 month hardware payback period. They report ~$38 revenue/GPU-hour on V4.1-Flash clusters.

Inference is clearly profitable. The question is whether it's profitable enough to justify the training research costs.


Replies

scheme271 • today at 5:04 AM

Are those statements audited or fact checked? Inference profitability is great but how much of that profit gets eaten up paying back training costs, R&D, and operating expenses.

➕ show 2 replies
javier2 • today at 1:06 AM

At best, this tells you v4.1 flash is profitable, but can they really get $38 per gpu hour? Sounds like a lot.

➕ show 2 replies
margorczynski • today at 1:17 AM

V4.1-Flash is probably quite smaller and much more resource effective than the frontier models. Add to that much cheaper energy in China.

calmworm • today at 1:29 AM

Clearly potentially profitable. Not clearly profitable.

parineum • today at 1:07 AM

How much did it cost to train Deepseek v4.1 flash?

➕ show 1 reply