logoalt Hacker News

tonnydourado • today at 6:01 AM • 1 reply • view on HN

> multiple independent judges

The first instance judge colluded with the prosecution, and when the supreme court was about to rule on a habeas corpus, a general tweeted a thinly veiled threat of military coup if the sentence wasn't confirmed. And the evidence was scant to begin with. Hardly surprising that the conviction was eventually overturned.

Bolsonaro's condemnation, on the other hand, was backed by much more comprehensive evidence, and resulted from a heavily scrutinized process.


Replies

matheusmoreira • today at 8:31 AM

If the process was so faulty, why was Lula's condemnation annulled based on the flimsiest of excuses?

Everything got thrown out because of a "tried in the wrong court" technicality. I'd still be disappointed but I'd have been far more sympathetic if what you posted had been cited as the reason for the maneuver.

➕ show 1 reply