logoalt Hacker News

uxcolumbo • today at 8:54 AM • 1 reply • view on HN

I think it's a false premise to begin with. Protecting your natural resources and rich biodiversity doesn't mean Brazilians have to suffer.

But thanks for clarifying your comment and position.

I get that Lula isn't great, politics is hard. But from the outside it looks like a small majority of Brazilians have voted to say 'not another Bolsonaro'. He would have probably continued like his father and fostered closer ties to Trump and borrowing a few tactics from his playbook, i.e. definitely not good for the average Joe like us.

Good for corporations? Yes - hence why Meta and co tried to push Bolsonaro.


Replies

matheusmoreira • today at 9:05 AM

> But thanks for clarifying your comment and position.

Thank you for listening in good faith.

I supported Bolsonaro because I saw his election as the only possible way to defeat the supreme court judges, who I believe are dictators. To me this was a priority that overrode all other concerns.

I do not at all share his alignment with Trump and Israel, and especially not his privatization efforts. I'd rather Brazil align itself with China. I understand people's rejection of Bolsonaro, and even agree. The very first comment in this thread came from me, and I expressed this opinion through it:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50237602

> Bolsonaro was closer to US interests than I'd like.

Unfortunately, it's been flagged to death for reasons unknown.

I clarified my overall position here:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50237862

➕ show 1 reply