logoalt Hacker News

AnthonyMouse • yesterday at 4:40 PM • 4 replies • view on HN

> Solar is cool but solar that can make it through the night and a couple cloudy days is way cooler

The fun part is that we're still well before the point when this even matters.

Almost 60% of the US grid is still fossil fuels, with around half of that still happening during the day. Which means you can get down to ~30% fossil fuels without any storage at all because all you do is go from burning fossil fuels during the day and at night to burning fossil fuels only at night.


Replies

chii • today at 6:16 AM

> at night to burning fossil fuels only at night

only natural gas plants can do this. a coal plant cannot spin up just for the night and turn back off when the sun comes up - it's incredibly inefficient and probably causes more premature wear/tear too.

➕ show 3 replies
Havoc • yesterday at 7:39 PM

Yeah the US will lag behind on this.

Other countries are better positioned. e.g. UK has really spiky wind energy. Right this second more than half the grid is wind. Which is both cool and problematic for managing the grid.

Grid scale cheap storage would dramatic help manage that chaos

➕ show 2 replies
saltcured • yesterday at 5:18 PM

Hmm, how much of that is base load versus the dramatic rise of natural gas plants that respond to dynamic demands? Even in daytime, I think you need storage to get rid of those, right?

➕ show 1 reply
HDThoreaun • yesterday at 7:03 PM

It doesnt make economic sense to serve the entirety of daytime electricity demand from solar without batteries. Youd have to tons of fossil fuel plants that turn off during the day and then back on every night. For solar to take the next step batteries are a requirement

➕ show 2 replies