alt Hacker NewsI really don't understand why Microsoft didn't build this when they released 64 bit windows.
16 bit windows wasn't complicated, and a simple VM and API translation layer could have kept compatibility going back 30+ years for not many engineering hours.
Yet instead they dropped 16 bit windows support and probably spent more engineering hours to support all the ancient software trying to update, and users who held back upgrading windows because they needed said ancient software, etc
Replies
On the other hand, I'd argue companies using 16-bit applications would be unwilling to upgrade to a 64-bit installation anyway. Microsoft decided it was better to push software developers to upgrade to Win32, given that 32-bit Windows already existed since 95.
being able to transfer HANDLEs across the 16/32-bit boundary notably for COM/OLE integration becomes a lot more painful
Microsoft says at https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/winprog64/ru...:
> Note that 64-bit Windows does not support running 16-bit Windows-based applications. The primary reason is that handles have 32 significant bits on 64-bit Windows. Therefore, handles cannot be truncated and passed to 16-bit applications without loss of data. Attempts to launch 16-bit applications fail with the following error: ERROR_BAD_EXE_FORMAT.
winevdm on Windows eschews that level of integration, but perhaps MS should have shipped WoW16 with limitations instead of nothing.
By the time 64 bit Windows comes around the only stuff still running 16 bit is on machines that will never be updated. Embedded boxes in industrial machinery that is itself no longer supported, that sort of thing. No point making it work if nobody will ever update to it.